USPTO serial 78578178
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Brad D. Rose
BRAD D ROSE PRYOR CASHMAN SHERMAN & FLYNN LLP410 PARK AVE 10TH FLNEW YORK, NY 10022UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | Potato chips, potato-based snack foods, processed nuts, processed edible seeds, candied nuts, candied fruit, candied fruit snacks, fruit-based snack food, soy-based snack food, fruit chips, fruit leathers, fruit paste, fruit peels, fruit conserves and preserves, jellies and jams, fruit pulps and rinds, fruit-based fillings for cakes and pies, banana chips and yucca chips, vegetable paste, cut and processed fruits and vegetables; fruit sauces, namely, apple and cranberry sauces; fruit topping; nut topping; whipped topping; protein-based, nutrient-dense snack bars; dairy products excluding ice cream, ice milk and frozen yogurt; yogurt, milk, cheese, cheese food, cottage cheese, half and half, cream, sour cream and sour cream substitutes, and non-dairy creamer; butter, margarine, margarine substitutes and cocoa butter for food purposes; dairy-based beverages and food beverages; milk-based beverage containing coffee; soy-based food beverage used as a milk substitute; vegetable-based food beverages; whey-based food beverages; egg nog and egg nog mixes, egg product, eggs and egg substitute; protein for use as a food filler or additive; unflavored and unsweetened gelatins; dairy-based, fruit-based and vegetable-based spreads; hazelnut spread, snack dips and snack food dips; vegetable, salad, cooking and edible oils; nut butters, peanut butter, edible fats, preserved truffles and truffle juice; frozen, prepared or packaged entrees consisting primarily of meat, fish, poultry or vegetables; salads, namely, pre-cut vegetable, fruit, garden and seafood salads; meat, hamburger, hot dogs, luncheon and deli meats, frankfurters, fish, poultry, chicken, game, veal and processed lamb; pickles, chili, soups, broth, soup mixes and preparations for making soups; jerky, meat jellies, meat paste, meat extract, meat-based spreads, meat juices, meat substitutes and mincemeat; royal jelly for food purposes; food package combinations consisting primarily of cheese, meat and/or processed fruit; snack mix consisting primarily of fruits, processed nuts and/or raisins; and cheese and cracker combinations | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 30, 2006 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 30, 2006 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| May 2, 2006 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 2, 2006 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 3, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 3, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 22, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 3, 2005 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 5, 2005 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 9, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |