USPTO serial 78580726
SOUFLETTE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MURRAY, DAVID T
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 113 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with SOUFLETTE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
John A. Clifford
MERCHANT & GOULD PC3200 IDS CTR 80 S 8TH STMINNEAPOLIS, MN 55402UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Player activated gambling machines | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 1, 2009 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 1, 2009 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 5, 2009 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 5, 2009 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| May 4, 2009 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Nov 3, 2008 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 2, 2008 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 1, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 1, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 27, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 20, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 10, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 21, 2008 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 19, 2008 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 27, 2008 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Sep 27, 2007 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 26, 2007 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 10, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 10, 2007 | LIEC | LEGAL INSTRUMENT EXAMINER (LIE) - CORRECTION | — |
| Jan 29, 2007 | IROA | RESPONSE TO ITU OFFICE ACTION ENTERED | — |
| Jan 24, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 26, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 26, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 20, 2006 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 19, 2006 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 27, 2006 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Nov 30, 2005 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 29, 2005 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 9, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 1, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 1, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 27, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 27, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 25, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 10, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |