USPTO serial 78581268
THE MIGHTY, MIGHTY PIT BULLS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FINE, STEVEN
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with THE MIGHTY, MIGHTY PIT BULLS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
LOS ANGELES, CA
LOS ANGELES, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
CARL GORDON OF GORDON DESIGNS
CARL GORDON OF GORDON DESIGNS GORDON DESIGNS1125 S HOLT AVE STE 3LOS ANGELES, CA 90035UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 041 | ENTERTAINMENT SERVICES IN THE NATURE OF FOOTBALL, BASEBALL, ICE HOCKEY, BASKETBALL, SOCCER, STOCK CAR AND AUTO RACING, MOTORCYCLE RACING, VOLLEYBALL, TENNIS, RACQUETBALL, SQUASH, HANDBALL, SOFTBALL, RUGBY, BILLIARDS, POOL, SKATEBOARD, GOLF, LACROSSE, WATER POLO, AND SKI TOURNAMENTS AND COMPETITIONS, AND PET SPORTS, TOY FLYING SAUCER AND WEIGHT PULL COMPETITIONS AND EXHIBITIONS; PROVIDING FACILITIES FOR RECREATIONAL ACTIVITIES; ENTERTAINMENT IN THE NATURE OF ARRANGING AND CONDUCTING SPORTING EVENTS; PROVIDING SPORTS INFORMATION BY MEANS OF TELEPHONE AND WEB SITES VIA A GLOBAL COMPUTER NETWORK; PROVIDING FACILITIES FOR AN ARRAY OF SPORTS EVENTS, SPORTS TOURNAMENTS AND ATHLETIC COMPETITIONS; ORGANIZING AND CONDUCTING PROFESSIONAL AND AMATEUR FOOTBALL, BASEBALL, ICE HOCKEY, BASKETBALL, SOCCER, VOLLEYBALL, TENNIS, RACQUETBALL, SQUASH, HANDBALL, SOFTBALL, RUGBY, BILLIARDS, POOL, SKATEBOARD, GOLF, LACROSSE, WATER POLO, AND SKI RUN TOURNAMENTS AND COMPETITIONS, AND PET SPORTS, TOY FLYING SAUCER AND WEIGHT PULL COMPETITIONS AND EXHIBITIONS; PRODUCTION OF TELEVISION, RADIO AND INTERNET PROGRAMS, ACCESSIBLE VIA A GLOBAL COMPUTER NETWORK OR A COMMERCIAL ON-LINE SERVICE, FEATURING ATHLETIC COMPETITIONS | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 29, 2008 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 29, 2008 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 24, 2007 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 24, 2007 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Sep 24, 2007 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jul 11, 2007 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 2, 2007 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Jun 2, 2007 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jun 2, 2007 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| May 31, 2007 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 31, 2007 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 27, 2007 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Dec 4, 2006 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 16, 2006 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Nov 16, 2006 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Nov 16, 2006 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 27, 2006 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Apr 15, 2006 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 25, 2006 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Mar 25, 2006 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Sep 27, 2005 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jul 5, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 15, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 30, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 25, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 24, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 24, 2005 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 24, 2005 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 24, 2005 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 24, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 23, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 22, 2005 | PCGR | PETITION TO DIRECTOR GRANTED | — |
| Mar 11, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Mar 9, 2005 | PCRC | PETITION TO DIRECTOR RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 9, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — |