Drawing for PRACTICE ANALYTICS

USPTO serial 78581325

PRACTICE ANALYTICS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3140653Status 710
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Sep 5, 2006
Examiner
FAIRBANKS, RONALD L
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 117

What this means

Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.

Status 710: Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active.

Need help with PRACTICE ANALYTICS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

William Giltinan

William Giltinan Carlton Fields, PAPO Box 3239IP DeptTampa, FL 33601-3239

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Computer software for use by medical offices in connection with the analysis of patient records, financial and clinical data, account management, contract management, referral analysis and for the tracking of clinical trends and manage care guidelinesSECTION 8 - CANCELLED

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 7, 2017CAEXCANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9
Mar 29, 2017ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP
Mar 22, 2017ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY
Sep 5, 2015REM2COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED
Jul 2, 2014ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY
Nov 20, 2013ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY
Jan 16, 2013ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 16, 2013REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED
Feb 15, 2012ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY
Nov 16, 2011ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY
Oct 19, 2011ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP
Sep 21, 2011NAS8NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 - E-MAILED
Sep 21, 20118.OKREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTEDThe USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline.
Sep 20, 2011APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL
Sep 13, 2011ES8RTEAS SECTION 8 RECEIVED
Feb 4, 2011CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED
Feb 4, 2011COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED
Aug 15, 2007ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP
Dec 6, 2006ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 6, 2006REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED
Sep 5, 2006R.SRREGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTERYour mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application.
Jun 27, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Jun 26, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Jun 23, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Jun 8, 2006CNTAAPPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER
Jun 7, 2006XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED
Jun 7, 2006GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED
Jun 7, 2006CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN
May 31, 2006GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
May 31, 2006IUAAUSE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED
May 31, 2006CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Apr 20, 2006ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED
Apr 19, 2006TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Apr 18, 2006AUPCAMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE
Apr 7, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Apr 7, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Mar 29, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Mar 29, 2006IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED
Mar 29, 2006EAAUTEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED
Oct 5, 2005GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 5, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 27, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Mar 14, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance