CopyMark Law Group
4.9/5
Drawing for BRAVE

USPTO serial 78582164

BRAVE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
DOMBROW, COLLEEN M
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with BRAVE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Trademark Monitoring
(312) 319-4460
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Start a new application
(312) 319-4460

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Anthony M. Keats

ANTHONY M KEATS KEATS MCFARLAND & WILSON LLP9720 WILSHIRE BLVD PH STEBEVERLY HILLS, CA 90212-2017UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
003Non-medicated skin care preparations, namely, skin creams; skin lotions; skin clarifiers; skin cleansers; cleansing cream; skin cleansing lotions; skin gels for accelerating, enhancing, or extending tans; skin conditioners; skin emollients; skin moisturizers; skin soap; skin abrasive preparations; hair shampoo; hair conditioner; hair gels; body spray used as personal deodorant; deodorant for personal use; non-medicated foot powder; shaving gel; shaving cream; after shave creams; sun block; sunscreen creams; non-medicated muscle rub and lip balm; fragrances, namely, eau de parfum; eau de toiletteACTIVE—
004CandlesACTIVE—
005Medicated skin care preparations, namely, topical anti-acne preparations; medical cleansers and ointments for skin and woundsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 20, 2011MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 20, 2011ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Nov 18, 2010EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED—
Nov 16, 2010EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Nov 16, 2010EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Nov 16, 2010EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Oct 27, 2010ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
May 18, 2010NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Feb 23, 2010PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Feb 3, 2010NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jan 21, 2010PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jan 20, 2010CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jan 14, 2010RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Jul 14, 2009RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Jan 8, 2009RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Jul 7, 2008RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Jan 5, 2008RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Jan 5, 2008ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jul 5, 2007RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Jan 5, 2007RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Jul 5, 2006RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Jan 5, 2006CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Jan 4, 2006CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Jan 4, 2006CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Jul 5, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 1, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 16, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 15, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 14, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance