Drawing for DIAMOND INSERT

USPTO serial 78583235

DIAMOND INSERT

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
DEFORD, JEFFREY S
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 115 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with DIAMOND INSERT?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Brian E. Turung

BRIAN E TURUNG FAY SHARPE FAGAN MINNICH & MCKEE1100 W SUPERIOR AVE STE 7CLEVELAND, OH 44113-1224UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007Extruding machine parts, namely die plates, die plate holders, die inserts and diesACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 2, 2007MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL
Feb 17, 2007ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL
Feb 17, 2007EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED
Dec 27, 2006EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF
Aug 31, 2006GECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED
Aug 31, 2006CNCFACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED
Jul 26, 2006ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED
Jul 25, 2006EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED
Jul 25, 2006JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY
Jul 22, 2006EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB
Jun 30, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jun 30, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Jan 9, 2006GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jan 9, 2006CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Nov 2, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED
Oct 24, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Oct 24, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Sep 28, 2005GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 28, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 28, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Mar 15, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance