USPTO serial 78586410
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
HERBERT DUBNO
HERBERT DUBNO KARL F ROSS PC5676 RIVERDALE AVE STE 310BRONX (RIVERDALE), NY 10471-0900UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | BIOLOGICAL MATERIAL, NAMELY, PROKARYOTIC AND EUKARYOTIC CELLS, NAMELY, VIRUS PRODUCING CELLS, ANTIBODY PRODUCING CELLS, CYTOCHROME P450 PRODUCING CELLS AND CYTOKINE PRODUCING CELLS, ALL SOLD IN CAPSULES FOR USE IN AGRICULTURAL, INDUSTRIAL AND CHEMICAL PROCESSES AND FOR USE IN DIAGNOSTIC APPLICATIONS FOR SCIENTIFIC AND RESEARCH USE | ACTIVE | — |
| 005 | UNIT DOSE CAPSULES SOLD FILLED AND CONTAINING BIOLOGICALLY ACTIVE MATERIAL FOR PHARMACEUTICAL, AND MEDICAL DIAGNOSTIC APPLICATIONS, NAMELY FOR THE TREATMENT AND PREVENTION OF CANCER, DIABETES, CARDIOVASCULAR DISORDERS, METABOLIC DISORDERS, INFLAMMATORY DISEASES, NEUROLOGICAL DISORDERS, ADIPOSITY, RHEUMATIC DISORDERS, AUTOIMMUNE DISEASES OR HEREDITARY DISEASES | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 8, 2008 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 8, 2008 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 11, 2008 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 8, 2008 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 7, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 28, 2007 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Nov 27, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 27, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 27, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 26, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 16, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 16, 2007 | D1BR | TEAS DELETE 1(B) BASIS RECEIVED | — |
| May 24, 2007 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 23, 2007 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 26, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 26, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 26, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 26, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 2, 2006 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 30, 2006 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 24, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 4, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 4, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 22, 2006 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 22, 2006 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 19, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 14, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 14, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 17, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 15, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 30, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 18, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |