USPTO serial 78589594
ROSSO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- WILLIAMS, IRENE
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 112 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with ROSSO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
JAMES G. O'NEILL
JAMES G ONEILL KLEIN, O'NEILL & SINGH LLP2 PARK PLZ STE 510IRVINE, CA 92614-8515UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | WOMEN'S, MEN'S AND CHILDREN'S APPAREL, NAMELY: BEACHWEAR, SWIMSUITS, BIKINIS, SWIMWEAR, UNDERWEAR, LINGERIE, SHORTS, PANTS, TOPS, BLOUSES, SKIRTS, MINI-SKIRTS, DRESSES, JACKETS, COATS, SUITS, SWEATERS, T-SHIRTS, BOARD SHORTS, BOXER SHORTS, BRIEFS, JEANS, JEAN DENIM SHORTS, DENIM SKIRTS, JEAN DENIM HATS, JEAN DENIM JACKETS, SHOES, DRESS SHOES, BOOTS, SNEAKERS, ATHLETIC SHOES, SANDALS, BEACH SANDALS, BEACH SHOES, SOCKS, DRESS SOCKS, ANKLE SOCKS, STOCKINGS, HOISERY, SPORT TOPS, SWEAT TOPS, SWEAT JACKETS, SWEAT SHORTS, SWEAT PANTS AND VESTS | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 16, 2006 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 16, 2006 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 13, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 18, 2005 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 18, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 6, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 23, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |