Where is the live CopyMark page for USPTO serial 78596957?

The live record is at https://getcopymark.com/trademark/78596957. Use https://getcopymark.com/trademark/{serialNumber} for any 8-digit USPTO serial.

Who owns NEUROBOTICS?

According to the public USPTO record for serial number 78596957, the listed owner(s) include: Neurobotics, L.L.C..

What is USPTO serial number 78596957?

Serial number 78596957 is the USPTO application identifier for the mark NEUROBOTICS. It is used to track examination, publication, and registration of this trademark.

Which trademark classes cover NEUROBOTICS?

The public record lists International Classes: 042. Each class corresponds to categories of goods or services identified in the application or registration.

USPTO serial 78596957

NEUROBOTICS

Q: What is the current status of NEUROBOTICS?

NEUROBOTICS (78596957) currently shows USPTO status code 603 on the public record. This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603

Filing date: Mar 29, 2005
Status date: Aug 8, 2008
Registration date: —
Examiner: THOMAS, AMY E
Law office: TMO LAW OFFICE 110 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with NEUROBOTICS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner

Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.

Trademark Monitoring

(312) 319-4460

Not the owner?

File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Start a new application

(312) 319-4460

Owner

Neurobotics, L.L.C.
Bridgeport, CT
Other trademarks owned by Neurobotics, L.L.C.

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Louis M. Heidelberger

LOUIS M HEIDELBERGER REED SMITH LLP1650 MARKET ST FL 25PHILADELPHIA, PA 19103-7394UNITED STATES

Goods and services

Class	Description	Status	First use
042	CONSULTING AND ENGINEERING SERVICES, NAMELY DESIGN AND DEVELOPMENT OF SURGICAL SYSTEMS; DESIGN AND DEVELOPMENT SERVICES FOR OTHERS OF MEDICAL APPARATUS PROVIDING ENHANCED SURGICAL CAPABILITIES; DESIGN AND DEVELOPMENT SERVICES FOR MEDICAL SYSTEMS PROVIDING ENHANCED SURGICAL SIMULATION AND TRAINING CAPABILITIES; CONSULTING SERVICES FOR OTHERS FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF MEDICAL SYSTEMS IN THE NATURE OF AUGMENTED SURGICAL EQUIPMENT	ACTIVE	—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Date	Code	Event	What it means
Oct 22, 2008	MAB3	ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL	—
Oct 22, 2008	EXPT	EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED	—
Aug 8, 2008	ABN3	ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL	—
Aug 8, 2008	EXPA	EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED	—
Apr 3, 2008	CNES	EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED	—
Apr 3, 2008	CNES	EXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED	—
Feb 7, 2008	JURT	JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY	—
Dec 28, 2007	EXFB	EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF	—
Aug 14, 2007	RECG	ACTION GRANTING REQ. FOR RECON. MAILED	—
Aug 14, 2007	RECG	ACTION GRANTING REQ. FOR RECON. MAILED	—
Aug 13, 2007	CFRC	SUBSEQUENT FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN	—
Jul 25, 2007	ACEC	AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED	—
Jul 25, 2007	CRFA	CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE	—
Jul 23, 2007	ALIE	ASSIGNED TO LIE	—
Jul 5, 2007	MAIL	PAPER RECEIVED	—
Jan 3, 2007	RECG	ACTION GRANTING REQ. FOR RECON. MAILED	—
Jan 3, 2007	CNCF	ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED	—
Dec 13, 2006	EXPI	EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED	—
Dec 13, 2006	JURT	JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY	—
Dec 13, 2006	EXAF	EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB	—
Dec 12, 2006	TROA	TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED	This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 12, 2006	CNFR	FINAL REFUSAL MAILED	A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jun 9, 2006	CNFR	FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN	A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
May 19, 2006	ACEC	AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED	—
May 2, 2006	CRFA	CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE	—
May 2, 2006	MAIL	PAPER RECEIVED	—
Oct 27, 2005	CNRT	NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED	A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 27, 2005	CNRT	NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN	A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 25, 2005	DOCK	ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER	—
Apr 5, 2005	NWAP	NEW APPLICATION ENTERED	—