USPTO serial 78596966
NEUROBOT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MCCAULEY, BRENDAN D
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with NEUROBOT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Louis M. Heidelberger
LOUIS M HEIDELBERGER REED SMITH LLP1650 MARKET ST FL 25PHILADELPHIA, PA 19103-7394UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 010 | AUGMENTED SURGICAL INTERFACE CONTROL SYSTEMS, NAMELY, MEDICAL APPARATUS AND INSTRUMENTS FOR USE IN GENERAL SURGERY AND FOR USE IN THE TRAINING AND SIMULATION OF SURGERY; SURGICAL SYSTEMS WITH SURGICAL EQUIPMENT IN THE NATURE OF AUGMENTED SURGICAL INTERFACES WHICH INCORPORATE SURGICAL INSTRUMENTS, MEDICAL TISSUE IMAGING APPARATUSES, SURGICAL INSTRUMENT MOTION ACTUATORS, POSITION CONTROLLERS AND OPERATOR INTERFACE COMPONENTS, NAMELY, SURGICAL AND MEDICAL APPARATUS AND INSTRUMENTS FOR USE IN GENERAL SURGERY; MEDICAL DEVICES FOR PERFORMING MICROSURGERY, NAMELY, MEDICAL APPARATUS AND INSTRUMENT FOR CONTROLLING THE MOTION OF SURGICAL INSTRUMENTS WITHIN A SURGICAL FIELD, AND SURGICAL INSTRUMENTS FOR USE IN ASSOCIATION WITH SUCH MEDICAL APPARATUS AND INSTRUMENTS; MEDICAL TOOLS AND INSTRUMENTS FOR USE IN CONJUNCTION WITH SURGICAL PROCEDURES PERFORMED UTILIZING AUGMENTED SURGICAL INTERFACES, NAMELY, MEDICAL APPARATUS AND INSTRUMENTS FOR ACCURATELY LOCATING AND POSITIONING AUGMENTED SURGICAL INTERFACES WITH RESPECT TO A SURGICAL FIELD; AUGMENTED SURGICAL SYSTEMS FOR ASSISTING IN THE PERFORMANCE OF SURGICAL PROCEDURES, NAMELY, MEDICAL APPARATUS AND INSTRUMENTS FOR USE IN GENERAL SURGERY; SURGICAL AND MEDICAL APPARATUS AND INSTRUMENTS IN THE NATURE OF OPERATOR INPUT MEDICAL APPARATUSES AND OPERATOR DISPLAYS THAT ALLOW AN OPERATOR OF AN AUGMENTED SURGICAL INTERFACE TO CONTROL THE PHYSICAL POSITIONING OF SURGICAL EQUIPMENT IN A SURGICAL FIELD, AUGMENTED SURGICAL APPARATUS AND INSTRUMENTS FOR CONTROLLING THE POSITION OF AND MOVING SURGICAL INSTRUMENTS WITHIN A SURGICAL FIELD, AND SURGICAL INSTRUMENTS FOR USE IN ASSOCIATION WITH AUGMENTED SURGICAL EQUIPMENT; SURGICAL SYSTEMS FOR PROVIDING TRAINING AND SIMULATION CAPABILITIES WITH RESPECT TO SURGICAL PROCEDURES USING AUGMENTED SURGICAL INTERFACES, NAMELY, AUGMENTED SURGICAL INTERFACE MEDICAL APPARATUS AND INSTRUMENTS HAVING INTERNAL CAPABILITIES FOR GENERATING FEEDBACK TO AN OPERATOR SIMULATING THE DISPLAYS AND CONTROL FEEDBACKS WHICH WOULD BE ENCOUNTERED DURING ACTUAL PERFORMANCE OF A SURGICAL PROCEDURE USING THE AUGMENTED SURGICAL INTERFACE; AUGMENTED SURGICAL INTERFACE CONTROL SYSTEMS, NAMELY, COMPUTER HARDWARE AND SOFTWARE AND SURGICAL AND MEDICAL APPARATUS AND INSTRUMENTS FOR USE IN GENERAL SURGERY | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 28, 2011 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 28, 2011 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 7, 2010 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Aug 6, 2010 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 28, 2010 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Jul 28, 2010 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Feb 4, 2010 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 28, 2010 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Jan 28, 2010 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 28, 2009 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 27, 2009 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Jul 29, 2009 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jul 29, 2009 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jan 29, 2009 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 29, 2009 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jan 29, 2009 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jul 29, 2008 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 29, 2008 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jul 29, 2008 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jan 29, 2008 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Nov 6, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 17, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 30, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 30, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 29, 2007 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Aug 29, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 29, 2007 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 29, 2007 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 23, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 14, 2007 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Aug 14, 2007 | ABND | ABANDONMENT DELETED BY TTAB | — |
| Aug 9, 2007 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jul 11, 2007 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jul 7, 2007 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jul 6, 2007 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jul 3, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 25, 2007 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jun 23, 2007 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jun 23, 2007 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| May 7, 2007 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| Jan 3, 2007 | RECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED | — |
| Jan 3, 2007 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 10, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 8, 2006 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Dec 8, 2006 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Dec 4, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 4, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 30, 2006 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 29, 2006 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 23, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| May 2, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 2, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 27, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 27, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 27, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 26, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 25, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 5, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |