USPTO serial 78608330
GIRLAWHIRL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3557551Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jan 6, 2009
- Examiner
- TOOLEY, DAVID E
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 112
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with GIRLAWHIRL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Fairfield, CT
Fairfield, CT
Westport, CT
TIPP CITY, OH
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Anna M. Vradenburgh
BTA Enterprises, Inc.4 Godfrey LaneWestport, CT 06880UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | providing a web site featuring information regarding shopping; providing a website featuring articles regarding shopping districts and stores | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Aug 29, 2005 |
| 041 | providing a web site on a global computer network featuring photographs, current events news, and information regarding sports and fitness; information in the field of exercise, and arts and culture; on-line magazines in the field of female lifestyles, beauty, fashion, and female issues all in the field of entertainment | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Aug 29, 2005 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by BTA Enterprises, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by BTA Enterprises, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by BTA Enterprises, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by METEOR CREATIVE, INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Similar marks named GIRLAWHIRL
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 16, 2022 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Aug 9, 2019 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Jan 6, 2018 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 19, 2015 | NA85 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 19, 2015 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Jan 19, 2015 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jan 4, 2015 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 4, 2015 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Jan 4, 2015 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 4, 2015 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 12, 2010 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 12, 2010 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 6, 2009 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Oct 21, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 1, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 16, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 16, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 8, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 11, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 7, 2007 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 7, 2007 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 7, 2007 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 7, 2007 | DMCC | DATA MODIFICATION COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 6, 2007 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Nov 29, 2007 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 29, 2007 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 29, 2007 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 29, 2007 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 20, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 19, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 19, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 22, 2007 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 22, 2007 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 22, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 25, 2007 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| May 25, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 13, 2007 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 13, 2007 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 21, 2006 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| May 21, 2006 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 21, 2006 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| May 17, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 17, 2006 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| May 2, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 2, 2006 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| May 2, 2006 | EAAU | TEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED | — |
| May 2, 2006 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| May 2, 2006 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| May 2, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 16, 2005 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 16, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 9, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 21, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |