USPTO serial 78612558
WARD
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- JACKSON, STEVEN W
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 107 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with WARD?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Curtis Castleman
CURTIS CASTLEMAN TOMKINS/THE GATES CORP IP LAW DEPTMS 10-A3, 1551 WEWATTA STDENVER, CO 80202UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 006 | Sheet metal products and components, namely metal hardware ductwork fastening devices, namely screws, bolts, nuts and washers, metal pipe connectors, metal flanges for connecting ductwork, metal damper air regulators, access doors, diffusers for sheet metal ductwork, weld pins, trapeze hangers, metal rods, metal rod locks; air turning vanes, sheet metal rails for turning vanes in air ducts; all of the foregoing for use in heating, ventilation or air conditioning applications | ACTIVE | — |
| 007 | Electrically driven tools, namely cleat fastening tool; duct corner injecting tool; duct flange cutting tool; all of the foregoing for use in heating, ventilation or air conditioning applications | ACTIVE | — |
| 008 | Hand-operated tools, namely, cleat fastening tool; duct corner injecting tool; pneumatic sheet metal screw gun; pneumatic duct flange cutting tool; pneumatic duct insulation adhesive spray tool; automatic portable duct seam sealant application tool; duct corner crimping tool; rod lock install tool; all of the foregoing for use in heating, ventilation or air conditioning applications | ACTIVE | — |
| 011 | Ceiling radiation and fire dampers for use in heating, ventilation or air conditioning applications | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 18, 2007 | MAB0 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INCOMPLETE RESPONSE | — |
| Oct 18, 2007 | ABN0 | ABANDONMENT - INCOMPLETE RESPONSE | — |
| Mar 21, 2007 | RECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED | — |
| Mar 21, 2007 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 29, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 29, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 24, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 26, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 26, 2006 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 26, 2006 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 7, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| May 22, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 22, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 3, 2006 | CRML | CORRESPONDENCE MAILED | — |
| Apr 27, 2006 | WOAG | WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY GRANTED | — |
| Apr 27, 2006 | WOAR | TEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 18, 2005 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 18, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 18, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 28, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |