USPTO serial 78614597
GERM DEFENSE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Aug 8, 2006
- Examiner
- GEARIN, AMY
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with GERM DEFENSE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Improvita Health Products, Inc.
Cleveland, OH
Improvita Health Products, Inc.
Cleveland, OH
Improvita Health Products, Inc.
Cleveland, OH
MEDICAL ALLIANCE FOR CONTRACT MANUFACTURING, LLC
SEVEN HILLS, OH
Other trademarks owned by MEDICAL ALLIANCE FOR CONTRACT MANUFACTURING, LLC
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Grant A. Monachino
GRANT A MONACHINO MCDONALD HOPKINS CO LPA600 SUPERIOR AVE E STE 2100CLEVELAND, OH 44114-2690UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | DIETARY HEALTH SUPPLEMENTS | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Feb 28, 2005 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Improvita Health Products, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Improvita Health Products, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Improvita Health Products, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by MEDICAL ALLIANCE FOR CONTRACT MANUFACTURING, LLC
- Other trademarks in Class 005
- Similar marks named GERM DEFENSE
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 15, 2013 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Aug 5, 2009 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Aug 8, 2006 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| May 16, 2006 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 26, 2006 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 29, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 29, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 17, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 13, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 13, 2006 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Mar 13, 2006 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Mar 6, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 2, 2006 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Mar 2, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 2, 2006 | EAAU | TEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 2, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 23, 2005 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 23, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 21, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 3, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |