USPTO serial 78615229
GEEK-TV
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BLANE, SUZANNE
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 114 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with GEEK-TV?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Sherman Oaks, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Richard J. Greenstone
RICHARD J GREENSTONE RICHARD J GREENSTONE ATTORNEYS & COUNS465 CALIFORNIA ST STE 300SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94104-1810UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 041 | Television show production; television scheduling; television programming; television program syndication; television production; ; production of television programs; production of cable television programs; entertainment, namely, television news shows; entertainment, namely a continuing science fiction show; entertainment, namely a continuing horror show; entertainment, namely a continuing science fiction show; entertainment, namely a continuing show starring super heroes; entertainment in the nature of on- going television programs in the field of science fiction; entertainment in the nature of on-going television programs in the field of horror; entertainment in the nature of on-going television programs in the field of super heroes; entertainment services, namely, providing a television program in the field of science fiction; entertainment services, namely, providing a television program in the field of horror; entertainment services, namely, providing a television program in the field of super heroes; entertainment services, namely, providing a television program in the field of science fiction via the Internet; entertainment services, namely, providing a television program in the field of horror via the Internet; entertainment services, namely, providing a television program in the field of super heroes via the Internet; distribution of television programs for others; distribution of television programming to cable television systems; cable television programming; production of cable television programs; publishing of books, magazines, and graphic novels featuring horror, science fiction, and superhero characters; publishing of web magazines featuring horror, science fiction, and superhero characters; publishing of electronic publications featuring horror, science fiction, and superhero characters; programming for network television, satellite television, cable television and video-on demand featuring reality shows, drama, comedy, talk, suspense, horror, science fiction and superheroes; acquisition of programming for network television, satellite television, cable television and video-on demand featuring reality shows, drama, comedy, talk, suspense, horror, science fiction and superheroes | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 20, 2006 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 20, 2006 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 22, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 22, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 21, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 4, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |