USPTO serial 78617967
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
SHANDONG FOTON HEAVY INDUSTRIES CO., LTD.
SHANDONG, CN
Other trademarks owned by SHANDONG FOTON HEAVY INDUSTRIES CO., LTD.
SHANDONG FOTON HEAVY INDUSTRIES CO., LTD.
SHANDONG, CN
Other trademarks owned by SHANDONG FOTON HEAVY INDUSTRIES CO., LTD.
SHANDONG FOTON HEAVY INDUSTRIES CO., LTD.
SHANDONG, CN
Other trademarks owned by SHANDONG FOTON HEAVY INDUSTRIES CO., LTD.
FOTON LOVOL INTERNATIONAL HEAVY INDUSTRY CO., LTD.
SHANDONG, CN
Other trademarks owned by FOTON LOVOL INTERNATIONAL HEAVY INDUSTRY CO., LTD.
TIANJIN LOVOL HEAVY INDUSTRY CO., LTD.
BEICHEN DIST., TIANJIN, CN
Other trademarks owned by TIANJIN LOVOL HEAVY INDUSTRY CO., LTD.
TIANJIN LOVOL HEAVY MACHINERY CO., LTD.
TIANJIN, CN
Other trademarks owned by TIANJIN LOVOL HEAVY MACHINERY CO., LTD.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
James M. Slattery
James M. Slattery Hamre, Schumann, Mueller & Larson, P.C.45 South Seventh Street, Suite 2700Minneapolis, MN 55402UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | Agricultural machinery, namely, harvesters; earth moving machines, namely, backhoes, graders, excavators, loaders, scarifiers, scrapers and trenchers; earth moving machines, namely, land leveling machines for constructing road; bulldozers; concrete mixers and vibrators; road sweepers; asphalt paving machines; power jacks; power operated grass / weed trimmers; pile drivers; injection plastic molding machines; diesel engines for machines; gasoline engines not for land vehicles; garbage disposals; snow plows; derricks | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Dec 30, 2003 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 22, 2018 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Nov 20, 2016 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 21, 2016 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 2, 2014 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 26, 2014 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Apr 15, 2013 | NA85 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 15, 2013 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Apr 15, 2013 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Mar 28, 2013 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 31, 2011 | A7OK | AMENDMENT UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED | — |
| Jan 31, 2011 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jan 19, 2011 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Jan 12, 2011 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Jan 12, 2011 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Jan 12, 2011 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Jan 12, 2011 | EROP | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION-POST REG RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 11, 2010 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Aug 4, 2010 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Jul 12, 2010 | PRAM | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 7 | — |
| Jul 9, 2010 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jun 2, 2010 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| May 24, 2010 | AMD7 | SEC 7 REQUEST FILED | — |
| May 24, 2010 | AMD7 | SEC 7 REQUEST FILED | — |
| May 24, 2010 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| May 24, 2010 | ERTR | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE REGISTRATION | — |
| Nov 20, 2007 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Sep 4, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 15, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 27, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 26, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 25, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 25, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 23, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 5, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 19, 2007 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 19, 2007 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 2, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 19, 2006 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 19, 2006 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 17, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 8, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 8, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 15, 2006 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 15, 2006 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| May 12, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| May 2, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 2, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 6, 2006 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 6, 2006 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 30, 2005 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 30, 2005 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 28, 2005 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 28, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 27, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 11, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |