USPTO serial 78619895
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Howard N. Aronson
HOWARD N ARONSON LACKENBACH SIEGEL LLPLACKENBACH SIEGEL BLDGONE CHASE RDSCARSDALE, NY 10583| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 021 | PERSONAL CARE AND COSMETIC ACCESSORIES, NAMELY, AEROSOL DISPENSERS, ATOMIZERS, SPRAYERS AND VAPORIZERS FOR PERFUME, COLOGNE AND TOILET WATER CONTAINERS ALL SOLD EMPTY; SOAP BOXES, SOAP HOLDERS AND SOAP CONTAINERS; SOAP DISPENSERS; COSMETIC BRUSHES; DUSTING BRUSHES, EYEBROW BRUSHES, NAIL BRUSHES, SHAVING BRUSHES AND HAIR BRUSHES; HAIR COMBS, FITTED VANITY CASES FOR USE AS COMB CASES; SPONGE-TIP APPLICATORS FOR MAKEUP; COTTON BALLS; POWDER PUFFS AND COSMETIC SPONGES FOR APPLYING MAKEUP; EXFOLIATING MITTS AND EXFOLIATING PADS; COMPACTS SOLD EMPTY; PORTABLE VANITY CASES; GLASS BODY CREAM JARS; COMPACTS SOLD EMPTY FOR POWDER; CANDLE HOLDERS NOT OF PRECIOUS METAL | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 18, 2006 | MAB1 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT | — |
| Apr 18, 2006 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Apr 18, 2006 | EXAR | TEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 1, 2006 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 7, 2005 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 7, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 29, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 11, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |