Drawing for WATERFRONT ROASTERS

USPTO serial 78620739

WATERFRONT ROASTERS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
MATTHEWS, AMOS
Law office
LAW OFFICE 117 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with WATERFRONT ROASTERS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Deborah A. Nilson

DEBORAH A NILSON ROZAN & NILSON LLP420 LEXINGTON AVE RM 850NEW YORK, NY 10170-0033UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
043Coffee house servicesACTIVEMay 1, 2005

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 5, 2007MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL
Sep 29, 2007ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL
Sep 29, 2007EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED
Jul 31, 2007EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF
Apr 6, 2007GECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED
Apr 6, 2007CNCFACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED
Feb 28, 2007EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED
Feb 28, 2007JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY
Feb 28, 2007EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB
Feb 16, 2007FAXXFAX RECEIVED
Oct 18, 2006FAXXFAX SENT
Oct 18, 2006FAXXFAX SENT
Sep 5, 2006GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Sep 5, 2006CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Aug 8, 2006DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE
Jul 13, 2006DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED
Jul 13, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Jul 11, 2006TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Jul 7, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jul 7, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 7, 2006GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 7, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 18, 2006TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Jan 5, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jan 5, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 5, 2005GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 5, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 30, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
May 11, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance