USPTO serial 78629500
BIRDMAN
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CARTY, GEORGIA
- Law office
- LAW OFFICE 117 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with BIRDMAN?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
James Carter
JAMES CARTER CARTER, HALEY & MCKEE LLC650 POYDRAS ST STE 2015NEW ORLEANS, LA 70130-7210UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Toiletries, namely toilet soaps, perfumes, colognes, bubble baths, bath gels, skin lotions, shaving creams, toothpastes, mouthwashes, deodorants and hair lotions | ACTIVE | — |
| 014 | Jewelry, namely rings, earrings, toe rings, watches, necklaces, chains, medallions, bracelets, ankle bracelets, tie pins, brooches, and cuff links | ACTIVE | — |
| 025 | Clothing in all fabrications, namely athletic footwear, shoes, boots, galoshes, sandals, zori, slippers, jerseys, uniforms, athletic uniforms, pants, cycle pants, trousers, slacks, jeans, demin pants, coveralls, overalls, jumpers, jump suits, shorts, boxer shorts, shirts, t-shirts, undershirts, night shirts, rugby shirts, polo shirts, tops, crop tops, tank tops, halter tops, sweatshirts, dress shirts, sweatshorts, sweatpants, warm-up suits, jogging suits, blouses, skirts, dresses, sweaters, vests, fleece vests, pullovers, fleece pullovers, snowsuits, parkas, anoraks, ponchos, jackets, dinner jackets, sports jackets, golf jackets, silk jackets, reversible jackets, coats, blazers, suits, turtlenecks, swimwear, beachwear, caps, berets, hats, headbands, wristbands, head wear, ear muffs, aprons, scarves, bandanas, belts, suspenders, neckwear, neckties, ties, bow ties, cloth bibs, infant cloth diapers, textile diapers, infant diaper covers textile, cloth diapers, booties, infant wear, namely, infant and toddler one piece clothing, infant sleepers, infants' shoes and boots, infants' trousers, one piece garment for infants and toddlers, underwear, briefs, trunks, bras, sports bras, singlets, socks, loungewear, robes, bathrobes, pajamas, sleepwear, night gowns, lingerie, camisoles, slips, stockings, body stockings, pantyhose, hosiery, knit hosiery, leg warmers, bodysuits, leggings, tights, leotards, unitards, gloves, mittens, rainwear, formal wear, namely cumberbunds, vests, and tuxedos | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 23, 2008 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 22, 2008 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 4, 2007 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 3, 2007 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 24, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 24, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 24, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 26, 2007 | CRML | CORRESPONDENCE MAILED | — |
| Mar 26, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 24, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 23, 2007 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 23, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 23, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 25, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 25, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 21, 2006 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Sep 21, 2006 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 21, 2006 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 20, 2006 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 12, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 10, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 10, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 20, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |