USPTO serial 78634377
LAUREL BURCH
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BUONGIORNO, CHRISTOPHER L
- Law office
- DIVISIONAL UNIT
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with LAUREL BURCH?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Mark B. Mizrahi
Mark B. Mizrahi BELASCO JACOBS & TOWNSLEY6100 CENTER DR STE 630LOS ANGELES, CA 90045-9202UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 014 | JEWELRY; CLOCKS AND WATCHES | ACTIVE | — |
| 016 | FICTION AND NON-FICTION BOOKS SERIES FEATURING AUTOBIOGRAPHICAL, RETROSPECTIVE AND ART RELATING TO LAUREL BURCH AND HER WORKS EXCLUDING CHILDREN'S BOOKS, BLANK JOURNAL BOOKS, PHOTO ALBUMS, POSTERS, ADDRESS BOOKS, BOOKMARKS, STICKERS, CALENDARS, STATIONERY, CARDS BEARING GREETINGS, ANNOUNCEMENT CARDS, ART PRINTS, GIFT CARDS, ILLUSTRATIONS, PAINTINGS AND THEIR REPRODUCTIONS, PICTURE BOOKS, POSTCARDS | ACTIVE | — |
| 021 | MUGS, PLATES, CUPS, DISHES, GLASS BEVERAGEWARE AND STEMWARE, DINNERWARE, VASES, BOWLS, PITCHERS, GOBLETS, NAPKIN HOLDERS, SALT AND PEPPER SHAKERS, CERAMIC FIGURINES | ACTIVE | — |
| 025 | CLOTHING, NAMELY, SHIRTS, SWEATSHIRTS, SWEATERS, JACKETS, SLIPPERS, T-SHIRTS, SOCKS, PAJAMAS, SCARVES, AND LINGERIE | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Burch, Laurel A.
- Other trademarks owned by Burch, Laurel A.
- Other trademarks in Class 014
- Other trademarks in Class 016
- Other trademarks in Class 021
- Other trademarks in Class 025
- Similar marks named LAUREL BURCH
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 8, 2008 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 8, 2008 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 1, 2008 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| May 1, 2008 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| May 1, 2008 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Dec 4, 2007 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 4, 2007 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Nov 27, 2007 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Nov 27, 2007 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 5, 2007 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 5, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 1, 2007 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| May 1, 2007 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Dec 4, 2006 | ETOP | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE PROCESS - TERMINATED | — |
| Nov 7, 2006 | CHPB | POST PUBLICATION AMENDMENT - ENTERED | — |
| Oct 23, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 19, 2006 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 19, 2006 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 30, 2006 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 26, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 24, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 14, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 13, 2006 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 13, 2006 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 13, 2006 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 23, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 14, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 14, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 14, 2005 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 14, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 14, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 31, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |