USPTO serial 78636055
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
OCTEVILLE SUR MER, FR
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
William C. Wright
EPSTEIN DRANGEL BAZERMAN & JAMES LLP60 E 42ND ST RM 820NEW YORK, NY 10165-0820UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | Machine tools ; compressed air machines ; compressed air pumps; machines for the transformation and the treatment of plastic materials; blowing machines for manufacturing hollow bodies ; extrusion-blowing machines and injection-blowing machines; machines for the treatment of plastic materials by implementation of a plasma technology ; machines for coating by implementation of a plasma technology ; machines for barrier coating for containers | ABANDONED | — |
| 037 | Renting, installing and repairing machines services | ABANDONED | — |
| 040 | Treatment of plastic materials by coating and covering; coating and covering of containers ; coating by implementation of a plasma technology | ABANDONED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 19, 2006 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Jul 19, 2006 | EXAR | TEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 18, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 18, 2006 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 18, 2006 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 18, 2006 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 23, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 16, 2005 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 16, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 16, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 2, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |