Drawing for MICROCHIPS

USPTO serial 78636227

MICROCHIPS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
HOLTZ, ALLISON
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with MICROCHIPS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Charles E. Weinstein, , Sam Hudson, , Bruce R. Parker, , Susan Barbieri Montgomery,

CHARLES E. WEINSTEIN, FOLEY HOAG LLPSEAPORT WORLD TRADE CENTER WEST155 SEAPORT BOULEVARDBOSTON, MA 02210

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
010Medical and diagnostic microchips and reservoirs that store drugs, chemicals or sensors, and which expose or release same, for use by professionals and consumersACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 29, 2009MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 29, 2009ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 10, 2008EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED
Oct 10, 2008AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL
Oct 9, 2008EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED
Oct 9, 2008EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
May 14, 2008EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED
May 5, 2008EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED
May 5, 2008EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Oct 24, 2007EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED
Oct 15, 2007EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED
Oct 15, 2007MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Aug 6, 2007EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED
May 8, 2007TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Apr 26, 2007EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED
Apr 26, 2007MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Dec 20, 2006EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED
Oct 23, 2006EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED
Oct 23, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED
May 30, 2006NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Mar 7, 2006PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Feb 15, 2006NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Jan 26, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Jan 20, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Jan 5, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Jan 5, 2006GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED
Jan 5, 2006CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN
Dec 28, 2005GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 28, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 16, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Jun 24, 2005AMPXPRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED
Jun 24, 2005PARITEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED
Jun 2, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance