USPTO serial 78642125
FLURT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 601
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- VOHRA, SANJEEV KUMAR
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 110
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with FLURT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
CITY OF INDUSTRY, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
CHRISTOPHER J. DAY
CHRISTOPHER J DAY LAW OFFICE OF CHRISTOPHER DAY301 E BETHANY HOME RD STE A-213PHOENIX, AZ 85012UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | WOMEN'S AND GIRL'S CLOTHING, NAMELY, SHOES, SANDALS, BOOTS AND SLIPPERS, SHIRTS, T-SHIRTS, TANK TOPS, VESTS, BLOUSES, JACKETS, SWEATERS, SWEATSHIRTS, DRESSES, SKIRTS, PANTS, JEANS, SHORTS, CAPRIS, BATHING SUITS, SOCKS, HOSIERY UNDERWEAR, LINGERIE, BELTS, BANDANAS | ACTIVE | Jun 12, 2005 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 15, 2007 | MAB1 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT | — |
| Mar 15, 2007 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Mar 15, 2007 | EXAR | TEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 17, 2007 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jan 17, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 27, 2006 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 27, 2006 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 28, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 19, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 19, 2006 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 13, 2006 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 13, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 23, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 5, 2005 | AMPX | PRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED | — |
| Oct 5, 2005 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 22, 2005 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 15, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 15, 2005 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 5, 2005 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 5, 2005 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jun 16, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 16, 2005 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jun 16, 2005 | EAAU | TEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 8, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |