Drawing for X-FAB

USPTO serial 78642360

X-FAB

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
BLANDU, FLORENTINA
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with X-FAB?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Theodore Naccarella

THEODORE NACCARELLA SYNNESTVEDT & LECHNER LLP1101 MARKET ST STE 2600PHILADELPHIA, PA 19107-2950UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
012Automotive vehicles, namely cars and trucksACTIVE
025Clothing, namely, t-shirts, thermal shirts, sweatshirts, fleece upper body garments, handwear, beanies, and bandanasACTIVE
028Toys, namely, board games, toy vehicles, toy model vehicles, radio-controlled toy vehicles, dolls, doll clothes, and doll accessories, role playing games, hand-held units for playing electronic games, and playing cardsACTIVE
041Entertainment services, namely, ongoing TV programs in the field of reconstruction of motor vehicles into unique motor vehicle devices, and driving and racing of such motor vehicles devices and arena shows, namely, in the field of motor vehicle reconstruction and racingACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 24, 2008MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 24, 2008ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 26, 2007EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED
Jun 26, 2007EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED
Jun 26, 2007EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Dec 26, 2006NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Oct 3, 2006PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 13, 2006NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Aug 16, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Aug 4, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Jul 30, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Jun 16, 2006TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Jun 8, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jun 8, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 23, 2005GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 23, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 23, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Jun 8, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance