USPTO serial 78642627
GREATEST HANDS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- DAWE III, WILLIAM H
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with GREATEST HANDS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Monroe, LA
Monroe, LA
Victory Sports & Entertainment, Inc.
New Orleans, LA
Other trademarks owned by Victory Sports & Entertainment, Inc.
Victory Sports & Entertainment, Inc.
New Orleans, LA
Other trademarks owned by Victory Sports & Entertainment, Inc.
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Greg R. Mier
GREG R MIER ONEBANE LAW FIRM1200 CAMELLIA BLVD STE 300LAFAYETTE, LA 70508-6667UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 016 | adhesive note paper, art paper, blotting paper, bond paper, book-cover paper, business card paper, calendar-finished paper, construction paper, computer paper, copy paper, craft paper, drawing paper, envelope paper, fiber paper, fluorescent paper, wrapping paper, graph paper, grocery paper, heat sensitive paper, illustration paper, label paper, laminated paper, laser printer paper, letter paper, loose leaf paper, luminous paper, magazine paper, metallic wrapping paper, mildew proof paper, napkin paper, newsprint paper, note paper, notebook paper, stationery paper, oil proof paper, opaque paper, postcard paper, poster paper, recycled paper, shelf paper, stencil paper, synthetic paper, tissue paper, toilet paper, waterproof paper, paper products, namely, paper towels, paper bags, paper banners, paper boards, paper flags, paper folders, paper mats, paper name badges, and paper table clothes; cardboard, namely, advertising signs, boxes, cartons, containers, and trading cards; and printed matter, namely, paper labels, postcards, calendars, charts, emblems, holograms, baseball cards, business cards, correspondence cards, holiday cards, greeting cards, invitation cards, occasion cards, sports trading cards, trivia cards, printed information folders in the fields of sports and entertainment, paper signs, poster boards, magazines featuring sports and entertainment, paper towels, napkins, paper flags, paper mats, tissue paper, and toilet paper | ACTIVE | — |
| 025 | clothing, namely, belts, pants, shirts, jackets, coats, sweaters, vests, ties, jerseys, shorts, tops, wraps, gloves, socks, briefs, underwear, scarves, tights, swim wear, sweat bands, sweat suits, footwear and headwear having at least one impression of a body part of a public figure | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Mainprints, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by Mainprints, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by Victory Sports & Entertainment, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Victory Sports & Entertainment, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 016
- Other trademarks in Class 025
- Similar marks named GREATEST HANDS
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 31, 2011 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 30, 2011 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Nov 2, 2010 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 1, 2010 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 29, 2010 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Oct 29, 2010 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| May 14, 2010 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| May 13, 2010 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 29, 2010 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Apr 29, 2010 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Oct 28, 2009 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 28, 2009 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Oct 28, 2009 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Apr 29, 2009 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 29, 2009 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Apr 29, 2009 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Nov 3, 2008 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 3, 2008 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Oct 30, 2008 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Oct 30, 2008 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Oct 30, 2008 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 29, 2008 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Apr 29, 2008 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Mar 18, 2008 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 18, 2008 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 13, 2006 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 14, 2006 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 15, 2006 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 26, 2006 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 27, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 23, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 19, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 8, 2006 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 7, 2006 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 7, 2006 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 22, 2005 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 22, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 22, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 9, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |