USPTO serial 78643649
MOTITAS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 605
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SOMERVILLE, ARETHA CHARESE
- Law office
- OFFICE OF TRADEMARK PROGRAM CONTROL
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with MOTITAS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Fred C. James
FRED C JAMES GUEVARA, PHIPPARD & JAMES PC1420 KETTNER BLVD STE 600SAN DIEGO, CA 92111UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 030 | Chewing gum | ABANDONED | Aug 10, 2005 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 9, 2006 | ABN5 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 9, 2006 | CORV | REVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE | — |
| Aug 1, 2006 | EXAR | TEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED | — |
| May 11, 2006 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 18, 2006 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 29, 2006 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 28, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 24, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 22, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 22, 2006 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Feb 21, 2006 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Feb 14, 2006 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 13, 2006 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Feb 13, 2006 | EAAU | TEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 9, 2006 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 9, 2006 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 8, 2006 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 7, 2006 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 7, 2006 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 4, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 27, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 27, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 24, 2005 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 24, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 24, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 10, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |