USPTO serial 78650450
JUICE WORLD
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MCMORROW, JANICE LEE
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 115 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with JUICE WORLD?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Tanya M. Reitzel
TANYA M REITZEL COASTAL TRADEMARK SERV VANCOUVER; BCC BRITISH COLUMBIAV6B 4N6BOX 12109, STE 2200 555 W HASTINGS,Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 032 | non-alcoholic carbonated and non-carbonated beverages, namely, fruit juices, fruit beverages, vegetable juices, sports drinks, fruit nectars, fruit and vegetable juice concentrates, fruit smoothies and fruit flavored water | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 2, 2007 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 2, 2007 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 12, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 25, 2006 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 25, 2006 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 25, 2006 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 25, 2006 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 24, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 10, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 10, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 4, 2006 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 4, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 3, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 20, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |