Drawing for IT'S NOT YOUR BODY, IT'S YOUR FITNESS ROUTINE

USPTO serial 78652191

IT'S NOT YOUR BODY, IT'S YOUR FITNESS ROUTINE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
HOFFMAN, DAVID AARON
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 107 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with IT'S NOT YOUR BODY, IT'S YOUR FITNESS ROUTINE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

MYRON AMER

MYRON AMER MYRON AMER PC114 OLD COUNTRY RD STE 310MINEOLA, NY 11501UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
041providing classes, seminars and workshops in the field of physical fitnessACTIVEMay 15, 1996

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 5, 2008MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
May 2, 2008EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Feb 11, 2008ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Feb 11, 2008EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
Aug 31, 2007CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED—
Aug 31, 2007CNESSU - EXAMINER STATEMENT - WRITTEN—
Jul 2, 2007EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Jul 2, 2007JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Jun 29, 2007EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Jun 11, 2007RECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED—
Jun 11, 2007CNCFSU - ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - WRITTEN—
Jun 1, 2007ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Jun 1, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 29, 2007MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
May 16, 2007CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
May 15, 2007CNFRSU - FINAL REFUSAL - WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Apr 25, 2007ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Apr 25, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 25, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Mar 23, 2007MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Feb 6, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 5, 2007CNRTSU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 30, 2007SUPCSTATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Dec 1, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Nov 30, 2006IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
May 30, 2006NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Mar 7, 2006PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Feb 15, 2006NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jan 21, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jan 20, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jan 12, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jan 11, 2006XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Jan 11, 2006CNEAEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED—
Jan 10, 2006CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Jan 6, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 21, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Dec 9, 2005UNPRUNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED—
Dec 9, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Oct 13, 2005UNPRUNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED—
Oct 13, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Aug 17, 2005ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 17, 2005REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Jun 21, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance