USPTO serial 78656009
XBUX
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MCDOWELL, MATTHEW J
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with XBUX?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Redwood Shores, CA
Redwood Shores, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Kevin S. Spreng
KEVIN S. SPRENG ROBINS, KAPLAN, MILLER & CIRESI L.L.P.2800 LASALLE PLAZA800 LASALLE AVENUEMINNEAPOLIS, MN 55402Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | ONLINE REGISTRATION FOR SPORTS EVENTS ORGANIZED BY OTHERS; INTERNET BASED BUSINESS NETWORKING SERVICES FOR SPORTS PARTICIPANTS, SPONSORS AND PROMOTERS | ABANDONED | Mar 7, 2005 |
| 042 | PROVIDING TEMPORARY USE OF ONLINE NON-DOWNLOADABLE SOFTWARE TO STORE, MANAGE, TRACK, ANALYZE AND REPORT DATA IN THE FIELD OF PROMOTION, SPONSORSHIP AND PARTICIPATION IN SPORTS EVENTS; PROVIDING TEMPORARY USE OF ONLINE AND NON-DOWNLOADABLE SOFTWARE TO FACILITATE COMMUNICATING AMONG PARTICIPANTS IN THE SPORTS COMMUNITY AND DISTRIBUTION AND EXCHANGE OF AWARDS AND INCENTIVES RELATING TO PARTICIPATORY SPORTS AND RECREATIONAL ACTIVITIES | ABANDONED | Mar 7, 2006 |
| 045 | INTERNET BASED SOCIAL NETWORKING SERVICES FOR SPORTS PARTICIPANTS, SPONSORS AND PROMOTERS | ABANDONED | Mar 7, 2006 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 27, 2008 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Mar 27, 2008 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Mar 27, 2008 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 27, 2008 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 24, 2007 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Dec 18, 2006 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Nov 14, 2006 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 17, 2006 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 27, 2006 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 5, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 1, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 17, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 16, 2006 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 16, 2006 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 16, 2006 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 10, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 17, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 17, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 18, 2006 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 18, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 12, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 27, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |