Drawing for SAN PABLO

USPTO serial 78669364

SAN PABLO

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
FAINT, MARY CATHERINE
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 103 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 600: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with SAN PABLO?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Rafael V. Baca, Esq.

RAFAEL V BACA ESQ THE R BACA LAW FIRM PLLCPO BOX 2638SAN ANTONIO, TX 78299-2638UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
029Food and food products, namely, milk based products and related goods, namely, sweetened milk based products, dulce de leche, leche quemada, and cajeta except cheese; milk based products and related goods, namely, sweetened milk based products, featuring processed nuts, fruits, and vegetables; sweetened milk based spreads; sweetened milk based gums and gelatins.ACTIVE
030Confections, namely, candy, individually wrapped candy; sweets, namely, toffee; snack foods based on sweetened milk; dulce de leche; cookies and wafers; wafers with sweetened milk based products; confections containing nuts, namely, toffee; wafers containing nuts and sweetened milk based products; condiments, namely, syrups; spreads containing sweetened milk based products; sweetened milk based products and nuts; sauces; sweetened milk based gums and gelatinsACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 23, 2007MAB0ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INCOMPLETE RESPONSE
Mar 23, 2007ABN0ABANDONMENT - INCOMPLETE RESPONSE
Feb 28, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Feb 27, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Feb 27, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 1, 2006GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Sep 1, 2006CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Aug 16, 2006ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED
Aug 7, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Aug 7, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Feb 6, 2006GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 6, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 2, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Jul 19, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance