CopyMark Law Group
4.9/5
Drawing for LAWDY MISS CLAWDY "QUEEN WITH A SOULFUL TASTE"

USPTO serial 78672970

LAWDY MISS CLAWDY "QUEEN WITH A SOULFUL TASTE"

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BEVERLY, JOSETTE MICHELLE
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with LAWDY MISS CLAWDY "QUEEN WITH A SOULFUL TASTE"?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Trademark Monitoring
(312) 319-4460
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Start a new application
(312) 319-4460

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
025Apparel and headgear, namely, tee shirts, caps, jackets, shoesACTIVE—
029Meats and processed foods, namely, meat, fish, poultry, meat extracts; dried and cooked fruits and vegetables, bread spread jellies, jamsACTIVE—
030Coffee, tea, cocoa, rice, sugar, flour, baking powder, bread, pastry, honey, mustard, vinegar, sauces, fruit sauces excluding cranberry sauce and applesauce, spicesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 31, 2008MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 31, 2008ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 31, 2008AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Feb 27, 2008EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Feb 14, 2008TPEXSOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION—
Feb 14, 2008PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Feb 14, 2008PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Jan 11, 2008FAXXFAX RECEIVED—
Dec 28, 2007MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 7, 2007ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 27, 2007EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Mar 27, 2007NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jan 2, 2007PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Dec 13, 2006NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Nov 21, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Nov 21, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Nov 15, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Nov 14, 2006XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Nov 14, 2006GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Nov 14, 2006CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Nov 14, 2006ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Nov 13, 2006PBCRWITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY—
Oct 10, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Oct 6, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Sep 30, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Aug 24, 2006TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jul 13, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 13, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 17, 2006GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 17, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 5, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 25, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance