Drawing for EXACTMATCH

USPTO serial 78675381

EXACTMATCH

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
JACKSON, STEVEN W
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 107 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with EXACTMATCH?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

eric mirabel

ERIC MIRABEL BIOARRAY SOLUTIONS35 TECHNOLOGY DR STE 100WARREN, NJ 07059-5148UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
042medical research services, namely, method of identifying compatible donors and recipients of transfused blood using genetic markers, including markers for minor group antigensACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 3, 2007MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Oct 2, 2007ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Oct 2, 2007EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Jul 17, 2007EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
Dec 18, 2006GNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED—
Dec 18, 2006CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED—
Oct 19, 2006JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Sep 18, 2006GECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Sep 18, 2006CNCFACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED—
Sep 11, 2006EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Sep 11, 2006JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Sep 8, 2006ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Sep 6, 2006EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Aug 4, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 4, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jul 5, 2006ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Jun 19, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 19, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
May 18, 2006GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
May 18, 2006CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Mar 23, 2006ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Mar 10, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 10, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Feb 10, 2006GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 10, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 9, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 28, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance