USPTO serial 78676580
NEVER SETTLE FOR LESS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3655927Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jul 14, 2009
- Examiner
- BLAIR, JASON
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 104
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with NEVER SETTLE FOR LESS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
ANN ARBOR, MI
ANN ARBOR, MI
Joplin, MO
Joplin, MO
JOPLIN, MO
JOPLIN, MO
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Laura C. Miller
Laura C. Miller Kilpatrick Townsend & Stockton LLP1001 West Fourth StreetWinston-Salem, NC 27101UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Computerized tracking and locating of freight vehicles for commercial purposes; providing trucking and freight transportation information management services for others, namely, the management of load tracking, load booking, pricing requests, and viewing of available equipment for customers, and payroll information, vehicle information, route information and load information for drivers by means of a global computer network, phone, fax, or email; providing shipment information via a global computer network, phone fax, or email for tracing the location and status of shipped cargo; providing rate information for shipping via a global computer network, phone, fax, or email; transportation logistics services, namely, planning and scheduling shipments for users of transportation services via a global computer network, phone, fax, or email; promoting public awareness of the need for traffic safety and safe driving practices involving trucks and other motorists through the distribution of visual aids and printed matter; information management services, namely, shipment processing, preparing shipping documents and invoices, tracking documents, packages and other freight over computer networks, intranets, and internets | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 039 | Freight services, namely, handling and hauling cargo by truck; truck and trailer leasing services; supply chain, logistics and services, namely, storage, transportation and delivery of documents, packages, raw materials, and other freight for others by air, rail, ship or truck | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by CON-WAY INC.
- Other trademarks owned by XPO CNW, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by Contract Freighters, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Contract Freighters, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by CON-WAY TRUCKLOAD INC.
- Other trademarks owned by CON-WAY TRUCKLOAD INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 039
- Similar marks named NEVER SETTLE FOR LESS
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 7, 2025 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Feb 21, 2020 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Jul 14, 2018 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 5, 2016 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 5, 2016 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 20, 2016 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Jan 21, 2016 | NA85 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 21, 2016 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Jan 4, 2016 | EROP | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION-POST REG RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 28, 2015 | PR23 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 8 & 15 | — |
| Dec 15, 2015 | EROP | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION-POST REG RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 18, 2015 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 18, 2015 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 10, 2015 | PR23 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 8 & 15 | — |
| Aug 10, 2015 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jul 14, 2015 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 14, 2015 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 14, 2015 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 27, 2014 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Jul 14, 2009 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jun 9, 2009 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 8, 2009 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| May 26, 2009 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| May 22, 2009 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| May 22, 2009 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Mar 4, 2009 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 2, 2009 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Feb 28, 2009 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Sep 4, 2008 | CORV | REVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE | — |
| Sep 4, 2008 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Sep 3, 2008 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Aug 28, 2008 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 28, 2008 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 28, 2008 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Aug 28, 2008 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Feb 28, 2008 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 28, 2008 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Feb 28, 2008 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 28, 2007 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jun 5, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 16, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 3, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 3, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 12, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 9, 2007 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 9, 2007 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 9, 2007 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 9, 2007 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 9, 2007 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 9, 2007 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 18, 2006 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 18, 2006 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 30, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 28, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 28, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 27, 2006 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 27, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 9, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 29, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |