USPTO serial 78682537
MOULINEX
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- PHAM, LANA H
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with MOULINEX?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Mark Lebow
MARK LEBOW YOUNG & THOMPSON209 Madison StreetSuite 500Alexandria, VA 22314Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | Electric egg beater; mixers | ACTIVE | — |
| 009 | Weighing apparatus, namely, scales; electric pressing irons; remote controllers for use with audio or video receivers; apparatus for transmission, recording, and reproduction of sound or images and data processing, namely, computers for domestic use; electric cloth irons and cloth iron pressing machines, electrically heated hair brushes | ACTIVE | — |
| 011 | Electric handheld hair dryers; electric space heaters; room humidifiers; electric room fans; electric apparatus for cooking foods, namely, ovens, rotisseries, spit roasters, electric grills, meat broilers, deep fat fryers, cooking stoves, warmers, plate warmers, electric sauce pans, crepe cookers, egg cookers, baby bottle warmers, and electric machines for preparing infusion, namely, electric coffee makers; apparatus for preparing yogurts, namely, electric yogurt makers; water filters for producing portable water for household use; ice cream freezers; refrigerating apparatus, namely, refrigerators, refrigerated beverage dispensing cabinets; grills for supporting goods during cooking, namely, electric grills, electric kettles; clothes dryers, electric hot air hand dryers; air filters for domestic use; fume and odor exhausting or destructing hoods for ranges or kitchens; water purification equipment, namely, water softeners; electric water heaters for domestic use; ice making machines; electric spits for use with electric grills | ACTIVE | — |
| 021 | Non-electric portable small household utensils for kitchen use, namely, strainers, graters, grinders for grinding coffee; beaters, namely, non electric egg beaters; sieves, non electric fruit presses and mashers, plastic salad drying baskets, non-electric filter coffee makers, tea pots not of precious metal; food cooking vessels, namely, cake pans, cake molds; hair combs; vibrating hair brushes and hair combs; salt mills and pepper mills; vessels for foods and beverages, namely, cups, jugs, bowls and plates; siphons for aerated water or cream; food cooking vessels, namely, stew pans, frying pans, sauce pans; non-electric pressure cookers; cleaning instruments, namely, brooms, non electric carpet sweepers, sponge mops, wringer mops, crumb cleaners, namely, non electric carpet cleaners, window glass washers, namely, cleaning cloths; shoe brushes; electric tooth brushes; non-electric kettles; kitchen tools, namely, non-electric food mincers | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by SEB S.A.
- Other trademarks owned by SEB S.A.
- Other trademarks in Class 007
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 011
- Other trademarks in Class 021
- Similar marks named MOULINEX
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 29, 2008 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 29, 2008 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 16, 2008 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 31, 2007 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 31, 2007 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jul 31, 2007 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Mar 6, 2007 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Dec 12, 2006 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 22, 2006 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 21, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 19, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 6, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 18, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 22, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 22, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 26, 2006 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 26, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 19, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 14, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 2, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 2, 2005 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 6, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |