USPTO serial 78695961
BODY PERFECT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SMITH, BRIDGETT G
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 115 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with BODY PERFECT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Springfield, IL
Springfield, IL
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 044 | Aesthetic medical services in the nature of dermal fillers, botulinum toxin injections, mesotherapy, enhanced skin rejuvenation, thread lift and feather lift surgeries, wire thread surgeries for deep wrinkles and scars, laser peels, and laser treatments for hair removal, acne, acne with levulan treatment, scar revision, stretch marks, actinic keratosis, collegen stimulation / wrinkle reduction, Dyschromia under eye and upper lip, enhanced skin rejuvenation, facial veins, facial sunspots/age spots, leg veins, legs sunspots/age spots, mole removal, port wine stain, pregnancy mask, Pseudofolliculitis, Rosacea, lunch hour peels, weekend peels, tattoo removal, Telangiectasia, Restylane, rosesea, and sun spots on all areas of the body | ACTIVE | Nov 1, 2004 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 31, 2007 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 31, 2007 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 31, 2007 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 31, 2007 | CNRT | SU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 25, 2007 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jan 29, 2007 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jan 29, 2007 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Dec 12, 2006 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Sep 19, 2006 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 30, 2006 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 31, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 28, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 21, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 21, 2006 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 21, 2006 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 14, 2006 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 14, 2006 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 8, 2006 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Jun 16, 2006 | PBCR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY | — |
| May 22, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 22, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 12, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 9, 2006 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 9, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 8, 2006 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 8, 2006 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 6, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 1, 2005 | AMPX | PRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED | — |
| Nov 1, 2005 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 26, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |