Drawing for BE HERE NOW

USPTO serial 78699237

BE HERE NOW

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
SAUNDERS, ANDREA DAWN
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with BE HERE NOW?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Bruce H. Sales

Bruce H. Sales LERNER, DAVID, LITTENBERG, KRUMHOLZ & ME600 SOUTH AVENUE WESTWESTFIELD, NJ 07090-1497UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
006Metal closet hooks, metal cabinet organization hardware, namely, cabinet stops, magnetic cabinet door catches, metal cabinet door catches, knobs, hinges, handles, screws, nuts, bolts, and washers, storage racks for cabinet organization made of metal wireACTIVE
021Pantryware, namely, bread boxes, paper towel holders, recipe boxes, napkin holders, salt and pepper shakers, trivets, household plastic food storage containers, household metal food storage containers, bowls, platters, dish drying racks, dish drain boards, kitchen utensil holders, mixing bowls, coaster sets not made from paper, plastic or cloth, cutting boards, kitchen utensils, namely, turners, slotted turners, serving and mixing spoons and slotted spoons, spatulas, and basting brushes, food splatter guards, spice racks, serving trays not of precious metal, salad bowls, lazy susans, cooking strainers, colanders, food strainers, soap dispensers, and trash cans; non-metal storage boxes, namely, plastic storage boxes for household useACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 19, 2009MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 19, 2009ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Apr 1, 2009EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED
Apr 1, 2009AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL
Mar 12, 2009EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED
Mar 12, 2009EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Sep 5, 2008EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED
Sep 5, 2008EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED
Sep 5, 2008EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Mar 11, 2008EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED
Feb 19, 2008EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED
Feb 19, 2008EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Sep 25, 2007EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED
Sep 13, 2007EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED
Sep 13, 2007EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Mar 13, 2007NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Dec 19, 2006PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Nov 29, 2006NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Nov 9, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Nov 3, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Oct 27, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Oct 27, 2006XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED
Oct 27, 2006GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED
Oct 27, 2006CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN
Oct 6, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Sep 20, 2006TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Sep 12, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Sep 12, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 12, 2006GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 12, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 12, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Mar 10, 2006ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED
Feb 14, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Feb 14, 2006PARITEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED
Sep 1, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance