USPTO serial 78700072
PLAN IT, BABY!
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- GARDNER, DAWNA BERYL
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with PLAN IT, BABY!?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
David J. Schuman, Esq.
David J. Schuman, Esq. CHURCH & DWIGHT CO., INC.469 NORTH HARRISON STREETLAW DEPARTMENTPRINCETON, NJ 08543-5297Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Non-medicated dermatological preparations for use by pregnant and nursing women, namely, creams, lotions, oils and gels for stretch mark reduction and skin emollients for use by pregnant and nursing women; non-medicated douches | ACTIVE | — |
| 005 | Vitamins, supplements, nutritionally fortified beverages; pharmaceutical and medicated preparations for the relief of heartburn, morning sickness, hemorrhoids, constipation, nausea; dermatological preparations for the treatment and relief of dry skin during pregnancy, dermatological preparations for post-episiotomy treatment and relief of swollen tissues, dermatological preparations for the treatment of cracked and sore nipples during nursing; vaginal wipes, vaginal lubricants, vaginal moisturizers; pharmaceutical preparations for the treatment of vaginal dryness and external itching; menstrual tampons, sanitary napkins and pads; incontinence diapers and pads; medicated douches; sleep aids, namely, sleeping pills, soporifics and pharmaceutical preparations to induce drowsiness; water-based personal lubricants; pregnancy planning kit primarily composed of ovulation predictor test, pregnancy test, antacid tablets, pregnancy planning calendar worksheet and instructional insert; in-vitro test kits primarily consisting of diagnostic test strips, test paper, collection vials, pipettes, reagents and instructional inserts for in-home use for testing menopause, fertility, testosterone, cholesterol, urinary tract infections, sexually transmitted diseases, osteoporosis, pre-menstrual syndrome, thyroid disease, heart disease, hypertension, allergies, influenza, hepatitis, periodontal disease, diseases of the eyes, ears, nose and throat; levels of illegal drug use, blood alcohol levels, body mass index | ACTIVE | — |
| 010 | Fetal pulse monitors, heart rate monitors, blood pressure monitors, respiration monitors, breast pumps, heating pads for medical purposes; incontinence bed pads and sheets | ACTIVE | — |
| 011 | Heating pads for non-medical purposes | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Church & Dwight Co., Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Church & Dwight Co., Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 003
- Other trademarks in Class 005
- Other trademarks in Class 010
- Other trademarks in Class 011
- Similar marks named PLAN IT, BABY!
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 10, 2008 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Nov 10, 2008 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 16, 2008 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 7, 2008 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Apr 7, 2008 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Oct 16, 2007 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 4, 2007 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Oct 4, 2007 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jul 13, 2007 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 30, 2007 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Mar 30, 2007 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Oct 10, 2006 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jul 18, 2006 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 28, 2006 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 26, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 18, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 2, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 28, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 25, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 25, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 22, 2006 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 22, 2006 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 13, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 27, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 27, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 13, 2006 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 13, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 13, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 2, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |