Drawing for TRIPALZ

USPTO serial 78704695

TRIPALZ

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
AYALA, LOURDES
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with TRIPALZ?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Howard R. Fine

Howard R. Fine Howard R. Fine, Attorney at Law2100 Sanders Road, Suite 200Northbrook, IL 60062UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Cameras; Computer programs for playing games; Electronic diaries and calculators; Video games, electronic games and computer games, namely, Interactive video game programs, Interactive video games of virtual reality comprised of computer hardware and software, Video game cartridges, Video game discs, Video game machines for use with televisions, Video game software, Video game tape cassettes, Video output game machines for use with televisionsACTIVE
028Hand held units for playing electronic games, Tabletop units for playing electronic games other than in conjunction with a television or computer; Electronic game equipment with a watch function; Toy computersACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 8, 2008MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 8, 2008ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 25, 2008TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Nov 15, 2007EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED
Nov 15, 2007EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED
Nov 15, 2007EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Apr 11, 2007EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED
Apr 11, 2007EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED
Apr 11, 2007EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Nov 21, 2006NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Aug 29, 2006PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 9, 2006NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Jul 10, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Jul 10, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Jun 17, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Jun 16, 2006TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
May 11, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
May 11, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 29, 2006GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED
Apr 29, 2006CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN
Apr 28, 2006TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Apr 4, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Apr 4, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 16, 2006GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 16, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 16, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Sep 9, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance