USPTO serial 78710932
COOL CORE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3620944Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- May 12, 2009
- Examiner
- DWYER, JOHN D
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with COOL CORE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Commerce Township, MI
Commerce Township, MI
Commerce Township, MI
COMMERCE TOWNSHIP, MI
Commerce Township, MI
Commerce Township, MI
Commerce Township, MI
COMMERCE TOWNSHIP, MI
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Matthew R. Mowers
Matthew R. Mowers BROOKS KUSHMAN P.C.1000 TOWN CENTER, 22ND FLOORSOUTHFIELD, MI 48075-1238UNITED STATESGoods and services
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by FKA DISTRIBUTING CO.
- Other trademarks owned by FKA DISTRIBUTING CO.
- Other trademarks owned by FKA DISTRIBUTING CO.
- Other trademarks owned by FKA DISTRIBUTING CO., LLC
- Other trademarks owned by FKA DISTRIBUTING CO.
- Other trademarks owned by FKA DISTRIBUTING CO.
- Other trademarks owned by FKA DISTRIBUTING CO.
- Other trademarks owned by FKA DISTRIBUTING CO., LLC
- Other trademarks in Class 017
- Other trademarks in Class 020
- Similar marks named COOL CORE
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 18, 2015 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Aug 8, 2012 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Jun 20, 2012 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Jan 19, 2011 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| May 12, 2009 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Apr 3, 2009 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 3, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 3, 2009 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Apr 2, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 2, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 2, 2009 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 7, 2009 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Oct 28, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 28, 2008 | CNRT | SU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 20, 2008 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Oct 20, 2008 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Oct 17, 2008 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Oct 17, 2008 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Apr 17, 2008 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 17, 2008 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Apr 17, 2008 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Oct 11, 2007 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 11, 2007 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Oct 11, 2007 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| May 10, 2007 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 18, 2007 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Apr 18, 2007 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Apr 18, 2007 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 17, 2007 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Oct 17, 2006 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jul 25, 2006 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 5, 2006 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 9, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 26, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 25, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 24, 2006 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| May 24, 2006 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| May 24, 2006 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| May 18, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 5, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 5, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 30, 2006 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Mar 29, 2006 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION WRITTEN | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Mar 22, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 20, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |