USPTO serial 78712951
VIRTUAL GEO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- WILKE, JOHN
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 104 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with VIRTUAL GEO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
David Bogart Dort
DAVID BOGART DORT HO-DORT INTL LLPBOX 26219 CRYSTAL CITY STATIONARLINGTON, VA 22215-6219UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 038 | Broadcasting services and provision of telecommunication access to; Communications via multinational telecommunication networks; Data transmission and reception services via telecommunication means; Electronic exchange of data stored in databases accessible via telecommunication networks; High bit-rate data transmission services for telecommunication network operators; Leasing of telecommunications lines; Providing access to telecommunication networks; Providing electronic telecommunication connections; Providing telecommunications connections to a global computer network; Providing third party users with access to telecommunication infrastructure; Satellite communication services; Satellite television broadcasting; Satellite transmission services; Satellite, cable, network transmission of sounds,images, signals and data; Signal transmission for electronic commerce via telecommunication systems and data communication systems; Telecommunication access services;Telecommunication services, namely, local and long distance transmission of voice, data,graphics by means of telephone, telegraphic, cable, and satellite transmissions;Telecommunications consultation; Telecommunications gateway services; Telecommunications reseller services, namely, providing long distance telecommunication services;Telecommunications services, namely, personal communication services; Telephone telecommunications services provided via prepaid telephone calling cards; Transfer of data by telecommunication; Transmission of data, sound and images by satellite; Transmission of sound and vision via satellite or interactive multimedia networks | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 11, 2012 | UNDN | UNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN | — |
| Dec 9, 2011 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| May 22, 2009 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| May 22, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 20, 2009 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| May 20, 2009 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| May 15, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 9, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 10, 2008 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Mar 7, 2008 | GNSN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 7, 2008 | GNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 7, 2008 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 10, 2008 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Oct 12, 2007 | GEA1 | NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 12, 2007 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 12, 2007 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 27, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 27, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 21, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 17, 2007 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Sep 17, 2007 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Sep 17, 2007 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Mar 15, 2007 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 15, 2007 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 23, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 21, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 20, 2007 | PGRR | PETITION GRANTED - RESPONSE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 3, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 3, 2007 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 3, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 24, 2006 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 24, 2006 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 28, 2006 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 16, 2006 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 28, 2006 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 28, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 23, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 21, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |