Where is the live CopyMark page for USPTO serial 78717682?

The live record is at https://getcopymark.com/trademark/78717682. Use https://getcopymark.com/trademark/{serialNumber} for any 8-digit USPTO serial.

Who owns MT. RAINIER?

According to the public USPTO record for serial number 78717682, the listed owner(s) include: Thor Tech, Inc., Thor Tech, Inc..

What is USPTO serial number 78717682?

Serial number 78717682 is the USPTO application identifier for the mark MT. RAINIER. It is used to track examination, publication, and registration of this trademark.

Which trademark classes cover MT. RAINIER?

The public record lists International Classes: 012. Each class corresponds to categories of goods or services identified in the application or registration.

4.9/5

USPTO serial 78717682

MT. RAINIER

Q: What is the current status of MT. RAINIER?

MT. RAINIER (78717682) currently shows USPTO status code 603 on the public record. This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603

Filing date: Sep 21, 2005
Status date: Oct 28, 2010
Registration date: —
Examiner: HOLTZ, ALLISON
Law office: TMO LAW OFFICE 111 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with MT. RAINIER?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner

Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.

Trademark Monitoring

(312) 319-4460

Not the owner?

File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Start a new application

(312) 319-4460

Owner

Thor Tech, Inc.
Saginaw, MI
Other trademarks owned by Thor Tech, Inc.
Thor Tech, Inc.
Saginaw, MI
Other trademarks owned by Thor Tech, Inc.

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

B. Joseph Schaeff

B JOSEPH SCHAEFF DINSMORE & SHOHL LLPFIFTH THIRD CENTERSUITE 1300DAYTON, OH 45402-2023

Goods and services

Class	Description	Status	First use
012	recreational vehicles, namely, travel trailers	ACTIVE	—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Date	Code	Event	What it means
Nov 9, 2010	MAB3	ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL	—
Oct 28, 2010	ABN3	ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL	—
Oct 28, 2010	EXPT	EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED	—
Aug 13, 2010	EXPA	EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED	—
May 26, 2010	RBFT	REPLY BRIEF FILED - CHECK TTAB FILES	—
Apr 21, 2010	GNSN	NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED	—
Apr 21, 2010	GNES	EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED	—
Apr 21, 2010	CNES	SU - EXAMINER STATEMENT - WRITTEN	—
Feb 24, 2010	DOCK	ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER	—
Feb 23, 2010	JURT	JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY	—
Nov 20, 2009	EXPI	EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED	—
Nov 20, 2009	MREI	NOTICE OF REINSTATEMENT MAILED	—
Nov 19, 2009	RGTT	REINSTATEMENT GRANTED - TTAB APPEAL FILED	—
Nov 10, 2009	EXAF	EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB	—
Oct 30, 2009	MAIL	PAPER RECEIVED	—
Aug 24, 2009	MAB2	ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND	The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Aug 21, 2009	ABN2	ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE	The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jan 15, 2009	GEA1	NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED	—
Jan 15, 2009	GECD	ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED	—
Jan 15, 2009	CNCF	SU - ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - WRITTEN	—
Dec 30, 2008	ACEC	AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED	—
Dec 30, 2008	CRFA	CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE	—
Dec 29, 2008	MAIL	PAPER RECEIVED	—
Jun 24, 2008	GNFN	NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED	—
Jun 24, 2008	GNFR	FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED	A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jun 24, 2008	CNFR	SU - FINAL REFUSAL - WRITTEN	A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
May 30, 2008	ACEC	AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED	—
May 30, 2008	CRFA	CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE	—
May 29, 2008	MAIL	PAPER RECEIVED	—
Nov 27, 2007	GNRN	NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED	A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 27, 2007	GNRT	NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED	A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 27, 2007	CNRT	SU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTEN	A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 27, 2007	SUPC	STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE	—
Oct 5, 2007	MAIL	PAPER RECEIVED	—
Oct 3, 2007	IUAF	USE AMENDMENT FILED	—
Jul 16, 2007	DOCK	ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER	—
Apr 3, 2007	NOAM	NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT	A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jan 9, 2007	PUBO	PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION	Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Dec 20, 2006	NPUB	NOTICE OF PUBLICATION	—
Nov 21, 2006	PREV	LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED	—
Nov 15, 2006	ALIE	ASSIGNED TO LIE	—
Nov 7, 2006	CNSA	APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER	—
Oct 16, 2006	ACEC	AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED	—
Oct 3, 2006	CRFA	CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE	—
Oct 3, 2006	MAIL	PAPER RECEIVED	—
Mar 28, 2006	GNRT	NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED	A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 28, 2006	CNRT	NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN	A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 28, 2006	DOCK	ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER	—
Sep 29, 2005	NWAP	NEW APPLICATION ENTERED	—