Drawing for FIRST TO DETECT, FIRST TO PROTECT

USPTO serial 78720283

FIRST TO DETECT, FIRST TO PROTECT

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
FOSDICK, GEOFFREY A
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 111 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with FIRST TO DETECT, FIRST TO PROTECT?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Peter B. Kunin

PETER B KUNIN DOWNS RACHLIN MARTIN PLLC199 MAIN ST PO BOX 190BURLINGTON, VT 05402-0190UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Content filtering software; anti-virus software; computer protection software; internet security software; computer software for filtering the content of electronic communications; computer software for monitoring, managing and filtering communications between computers; computer software for protecting computers and computer networks; computer databases of information for use in monitoring, managing, filtering and protecting electronic communications, computer and computer networksACTIVEApr 29, 2005

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 28, 2007MAB1ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT
Nov 28, 2007ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED
Nov 27, 2007EXARTEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED
Oct 26, 2007GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED
Oct 26, 2007GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Oct 26, 2007CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Oct 12, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Oct 12, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Oct 12, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 23, 2007GNSIINQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED
Apr 23, 2007CNSISUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN
Nov 22, 2006ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 22, 2006REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED
Oct 23, 2006GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED
Oct 23, 2006CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN
Oct 19, 2006TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Sep 22, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Sep 22, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 30, 2006GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 30, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 30, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Sep 30, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance