CopyMark Law Group
4.9/5
Drawing for EMOTICLIPS

USPTO serial 78721421

EMOTICLIPS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
FLETCHER, TRACY L
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with EMOTICLIPS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Trademark Monitoring
(312) 319-4460
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Start a new application
(312) 319-4460

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

David K. Friedland

DAVID K FRIEDLAND LOTT & FRIEDLAND PAPO BOX 141098CORAL GABLES, FL 33114-1098UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
028Circular discs for use as collectable toys and as game pieces in trading games, with or without functional clips incorporated therein and with or without promotional or advertising material incorporated thereonACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 4, 2009MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 4, 2009ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 21, 2008DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 9, 2008EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Oct 8, 2008AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Oct 6, 2008TPEXSOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION—
Oct 6, 2008PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Oct 6, 2008PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Oct 3, 2008EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Oct 3, 2008EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Aug 6, 2008MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 6, 2008ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Apr 3, 2008EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Sep 27, 2007EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Sep 27, 2007EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Sep 27, 2007EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Apr 3, 2007NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jan 9, 2007PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Dec 20, 2006NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Nov 21, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Nov 9, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Nov 2, 2006CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Nov 1, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Nov 1, 2006XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Nov 1, 2006CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Nov 1, 2006TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Oct 2, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 2, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 3, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 3, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 30, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 3, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance