USPTO serial 78725193
OVK
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BESCH, JAY C
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with OVK?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Dongguan, Guangdong, CN
Dongguan, Guangdong, CN
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Lianchao Han
LIANCHAO HAN IPFORTUNE LLC1700 PENNSYLVANIA AVE NW STE 400WASHINGTON, DC 20006-4707UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computers, and namely desktop computers, notebook computers, laptop computers, personal and handheld computers, servers, computers peripheral devices and parts and fittings therefore, monitors, keyboards, mouse, printers, scanners, multimedia LCD video projectors, co-processors, modems, hard and floppy disk drives, tape drives, CD read/write drives, digital video read/write drives, optical drives, data storage devices, backup drives for computers, personal digital assistant (PDA), electronic organizers, electronic notepads, digital audio/video recorders, and digital audio/video playback devices; Fax devices; Electric signs, Mobile telephones; Blank CDs for sound or video recording; TV sets; Cameras; Optical data medium, namely blank optical discs, DVD-R , DVD-RW, DVD-RAM, articulated Optical DVD (AO-DVD) and NanoGrating DVD (BG-DVD) discs; Optical disc machines and parts therefore, namely disc machines and parts therefor, namely, optical disc changers and optical disc cartridges; Batteries; Video disc players and remote controls for use with all the aforementioned goods | ACTIVE | — |
| 011 | Lighting fixtures; Electric cooking appliances, namely electric kettles, electric pressure cookers, electric rice cookers, gas rice cookers, slow cookers, electric roasters, electric food pans, electric thermo pots, toasters, electric coffee makers, electric barbecue griddles, electric cooking stoves, electric cooking stoves with ovens; Refrigerators; Fans, namely electric fans; Heating apparatus, namely electric stoves, electric space heaters, electric blankets, electric foot warmers, electric floor carpets, electric heating fans, electric radiators for heating buildings; Water apparatus, namely electric water coolers, electric ice makers, hot water tanks; Sanitary appliances and equipment, namely sterilizers, electric bidets, electric home showers, electric water heaters; dryers, namely, electric hand dryers, electric dish dryers, electric hair dryers, electric clothes dryers, water purifiers for domestic use, electric pore cleaners for domestic use; Gas lighters primarily for lighting grills, fireplaces and candles | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 5, 2008 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 5, 2008 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 31, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 26, 2007 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Apr 3, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 14, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 13, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 13, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 10, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 8, 2007 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 8, 2007 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 8, 2007 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 18, 2006 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 18, 2006 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 18, 2006 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 9, 2006 | GPRA | PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Nov 9, 2006 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION WRITTEN | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Oct 3, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 25, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 25, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 7, 2006 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 7, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 5, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 6, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |