USPTO serial 78726949
CLARIO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- THOMAS, JANICE
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with CLARIO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Margaret M. Kelton
Margaret M. Anderson Anderson Law Group, PLLC9600 Greate Hills TrailSuite 150WAustin, TX 78759Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer programs for decompressing images to reverse image quality damage from high compression and enhance quality factors caused by image capture and image processing prior to compression; Computer software for use in relation to decompression of images; Electronic cards for processing images to avoid image quality damage caused by high compression algorithms and enhance quality factors caused by image capture and image processing prior to compression | ACTIVE | — |
| 038 | Electronic transmission of images using a process for decompressing images to reverse image quality damage from high compression due to telecommunication; Electronic delivery of images via a global computer network with enhanced quality factors caused by image capture and image processing prior to compression and following decompression of images compressed for telecommunication; Computer-aided transmission of images with enhance quality factors caused by image capture and image processing prior to compression | ACTIVE | — |
| 040 | Digital enhancement of images to reverse image quality damage from high compression and enhance quality factors caused by image capture image processing prior to compression; Digital image correction services of videos for decompressing images to reverse image quality damage from high compression and enhance quality factors caused by image capture image processing prior to compression; Electronic alteration and/or retouching of images to reverse image quality damage from high compression and enhance quality factors caused by image capture image processing prior to compression | ACTIVE | — |
| 041 | Digital imaging services to reverse image quality damage from high compression and enhance quality factors caused by image capture image processing prior to compression; Editing of images to reverse image quality damage from high compression and enhance quality factors caused by image capture image processing prior to compression | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by SozoTek, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by SozoTek, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 038
- Other trademarks in Class 040
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Similar marks named CLARIO
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 2, 2008 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 18, 2007 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 23, 2007 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 24, 2007 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jan 30, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 10, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 12, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 12, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 27, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 27, 2006 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 27, 2006 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 27, 2006 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 27, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 25, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 25, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 5, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 25, 2006 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 25, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 19, 2006 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 19, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 12, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 12, 2006 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Apr 12, 2006 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 9, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 11, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |