USPTO serial 78729272
SCI FRI
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MCMORROW, JANICE LEE
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SCI FRI?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Los Angeles, CA
Los Angeles, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Francie R. Gorowitz
Francie R. Gorowitz KATTEN MUCHIN ROSENMAN, LLP2029 CENTURY PARK E STE 2600LOS ANGELES, CA 90067-3012UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 041 | Entertainment services, namely, the production and distribution of motion pictures, films, television programs, interactive television programs, cable television programming and satellite television programming in the fields of animated and live-action entertainment, science fiction, comedy, drama, mystery and psychic phenomena; audio recording and production of animated and live action entertainment, science fiction, comedy, drama, mystery and psychic phenomena; entertainment in the nature of theater productions in the fields of animated and live-action entertainment, science fiction, comedy, drama, mystery and psychic phenomena; publication of books, magazines, cartoons, comic strips and comic books; fan club services | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 22, 2011 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 22, 2011 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 15, 2011 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 14, 2011 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 11, 2011 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Jan 11, 2011 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jul 17, 2010 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 16, 2010 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 14, 2010 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Jul 14, 2010 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Nov 30, 2009 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 19, 2009 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Nov 19, 2009 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jul 29, 2009 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 29, 2009 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Jul 6, 2009 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jul 6, 2009 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Dec 31, 2008 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 31, 2008 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Dec 31, 2008 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Oct 21, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 22, 2008 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jun 6, 2008 | TMBN | TTAB RELEASE CASE TO TRADEMARKS | — |
| Feb 19, 2008 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 27, 2007 | ABND | ABANDONMENT DELETED BY TTAB | — |
| Apr 10, 2007 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Apr 10, 2007 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Apr 10, 2007 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 14, 2006 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 14, 2006 | OPPF | OPPOSITION PAPERS RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Nov 21, 2006 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 1, 2006 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 12, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 2, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 28, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 19, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 19, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 17, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 12, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 12, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 12, 2006 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jul 12, 2006 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 22, 2005 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 22, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 21, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 12, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |