USPTO serial 78738692
AMERICAN HALAL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- RINGLE, JAMES W
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with AMERICAN HALAL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | Animal oils and fats; Beef; Beef patties; Beef slices; Beef stock; Blended oil; Butter; Butter substitutes; Canned or bottled vegetables; Chicken; Chicken stock; Chocolate milk; Cocoa butter for food purposes; Coconut oil; Coconut oil and fat; Condensed milk; Cooking oil; Corn oil; Corned beef; Corned beef hash; Cut vegetables; Dairy products excluding ice cream, ice milk and frozen yogurt; Dairy-based beverages; Dairy-based chocolate food beverages; Dairy-based dips; Dairy-based food beverages; Dried beef; Dried vegetables; Edible oil; Fish; Fish cakes; Frozen vegetables; Fruit and vegetable salads; Goat milk; Half and half; Hardened oils; Milk; Milk based beverages containing fruit juice; Milk beverages containing fruits; Milk beverages with high milk content; Milk drinks containing fruits; Milk powder for nutritional purposes; Milk proteins; Milk-based beverage containing coffee; Non-dairy creamer; Nut butters; Oils and fats for food; Olive oil; Palm oil; Peanut butter; Peanut oil; Pickled vegetables; Poultry, namely, chicken, turkey; Powdered milk for food purposes; Pre-cut vegetable salad; Prepared beef; Preserved vegetables in oil; Preserved, dried, cooked and grilled vegetables; Processed garlic; Processed lamb; Processed soy beans; Processed vegetables and fruits; Rape oil; Roast beef; Seafood; Seafood, namely, shrimp, lobster; Sheep milk; Shortening; Sliced vegetables; Soy bean oil; Soy burger patties; Soy protein for use as a food additive; Soy-based food beverage used as a milk substitute; Soybean milk; Sunflower oil; Tuna fish; Tuna fish; Vegetable oils; Vegetable oils and fats; Vegetable paste; Vegetable puree; Vegetable-based snack foods; Vegetables, instant frozen | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by World Trade Promotion Center, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by World Trade Promotion Center, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 029
- Similar marks named AMERICAN HALAL
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 2, 2008 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 12, 2007 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 10, 2007 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jan 16, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 27, 2006 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 29, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 27, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 9, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 9, 2006 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 9, 2006 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 9, 2006 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 8, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 6, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 6, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 9, 2006 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 9, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 26, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 27, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |