Drawing for SYNOPSIS

USPTO serial 78739961

SYNOPSIS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 605
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
MICHELI, ANGELA M
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SYNOPSIS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

STEWART BELLUS

STEWART BELLUS COLLARD & ROE1077 NORTHERN BLVDROSLYN, NY 11576-1614UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035professional consultation in the field of electronic data processing, none of the aforementioned services in relation to integrated circuits, semiconductors or electronic design automationABANDONED
037maintenance and repair of data processing equipment and computers, none of the aforementioned services in relation to integrated circuits, semiconductors or electronic design automationABANDONED
041holding of and carrying out of classes, seminars, conferences and workshops in the field of computer and software training, word and data processing, none of the aforementioned services in relation to integrated circuits, semiconductors or electronic design automationABANDONED
042professional consultation in the field of information technology, computer consultation, computer programming for others, none of the aforementioned services in relation to integrated circuits, semiconductors or electronic design automationABANDONED

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 14, 2006ABN5ABANDONMENT - AFTER PUBLICATION
Dec 14, 2006EXARTEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED
Oct 3, 2006NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Aug 31, 2006AMPBAMENDMENT/PETITION AFTER APPROVAL FOR PUB ENTERED
Jul 18, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 11, 2006PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jun 21, 2006NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
May 19, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
May 19, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
May 12, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
May 10, 2006TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Apr 28, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Apr 28, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 27, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 25, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 20, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Mar 17, 2006PARITEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED
Oct 31, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance