USPTO serial 78741387
DNV
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3388860Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Feb 26, 2008
- Examiner
- FIRST, VIVIAN M
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 114
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with DNV?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Rebecca B. Lederhouse, Leslie A. Bertagnolli, Paula J. Krasny, David J. Davis, Lisa Parker Gates, M. Tally George and Lee Bollinger
David J. Davis BAKER & MCKENZIE LLP300 East Randolph StreetSuite 5000CHICAGO, IL 60601Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer software for design, construction, strength assessment, risk and information management and analysis, database functions, application service provider functions, and for providing technical and business support in a variety of fields | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Aug 1, 1992 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Det Norske Veritas AS
- Other trademarks owned by Det Norske Veritas AS
- Other trademarks owned by Det Norske Veritas AS
- Other trademarks owned by DNV GL AS
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Similar marks named DNV
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 28, 2018 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Feb 25, 2015 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Feb 6, 2014 | NA85 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - MAILED | — |
| Feb 6, 2014 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Feb 6, 2014 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jan 24, 2014 | 815F | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) & SEC. 15 FILED | — |
| Jan 24, 2014 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 24, 2014 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 30, 2012 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 26, 2008 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Dec 11, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 21, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 6, 2007 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Nov 6, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 6, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 6, 2007 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 6, 2007 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 6, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 24, 2007 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 24, 2007 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 7, 2006 | INOA | AMENDMENT AFTER NOA NOT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 24, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 6, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 2, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 1, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 1, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 20, 2006 | MDSM | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Feb 7, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 1, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |