Drawing for ASSETTRACKING

USPTO serial 78742220

ASSETTRACKING

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
HENRY, NAKIA D
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 129 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ASSETTRACKING?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Stanley D. Ference III

STANLEY D FERENCE III FERENCE & ASSOCIATES409 BROAD STSEWICKLEY, PA 15143-1557UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009COMPUTER SOFTWARE FOR ASSISTING MEDICAL PERSONNEL IN LOCATING ASSETS IN A MEDICAL FACILITY USED IN THE DELIVERY OF PATIENT CAREACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 4, 2008MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL
Aug 15, 2008ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL
Aug 15, 2008EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED
Jun 30, 2008EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF
Mar 6, 2008GEA1NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED
Mar 6, 2008GECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED
Mar 6, 2008CNCFACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED
Jan 29, 2008ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED
Jan 29, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jan 23, 2008ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Jan 14, 2008FAXXFAX RECEIVED
Jan 14, 2008EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED
Jan 14, 2008JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY
Jan 14, 2008EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB
Jul 13, 2007GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED
Jul 13, 2007GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jul 13, 2007CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jun 20, 2007ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED
Jun 20, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jun 18, 2007FAXXFAX RECEIVED
Dec 18, 2006GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 18, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 29, 2006ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED
Nov 29, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Nov 29, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Nov 6, 2006FAXXFAX RECEIVED
May 9, 2006GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 9, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 2, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Nov 1, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance