Drawing for MARKET INTELLIGENCE

USPTO serial 78751545

MARKET INTELLIGENCE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3203114Status 800Renewal
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Jan 23, 2007
Examiner
FARRELL,ANNE M
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

This registration is in, or will soon enter, a USPTO maintenance window. Missing a Section 8 or Section 9 filing can cancel the registration.

Status 800: Status 800 means the registration was renewed after acceptable combined Section 8 and Section 9 filings. The mark remains registered for another 10-year term with active federal protection.

Need help with MARKET INTELLIGENCE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Get help with this Renewal, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Get Attorney Assistance for just $399*

Plus Government fees of $650

Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Andrew Roppel

Andrew Roppel Holland & Hart LLPP.O. Box 8749Attn: Trademark docketingDenver, CO 80201

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
042Providing online non-downloadable software for creating, from a database compiled daily from the Internet's global routing tables, indices and reports that contain competitive information on the global, national and regional rankings of all Internet service providers based on the actual number and quality of customer networks they help connect to the InternetACTIVENov 1, 2006

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 23, 2026REM2COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED—
Jun 1, 2017CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Jun 1, 2017COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED—
Apr 3, 2017ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 3, 2017REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Mar 29, 2017ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Mar 20, 2017NA89NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED—
Mar 20, 2017RNL1REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS)The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active.
Mar 20, 201789AGREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTEDThe USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary.
Mar 20, 2017APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Jan 23, 2017E89RTEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED—
Jan 23, 2017TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jan 23, 2016REM2COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED—
Dec 10, 2014ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Nov 12, 2014ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Oct 21, 2014ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 21, 2014REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Oct 15, 2014ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Feb 4, 2013NAS8NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 - E-MAILED—
Feb 4, 20138.OKREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTEDThe USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline.
Feb 4, 2013APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Jan 23, 2013ES8RTEAS SECTION 8 RECEIVED—
Apr 24, 2012TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jan 23, 2007R.SRREGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTERYour mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application.
Dec 19, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Dec 18, 2006CNTAAPPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER—
Dec 18, 2006IUAAUSE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED—
Nov 28, 2006AUPCAMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Nov 28, 2006TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Nov 28, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Nov 3, 2006IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
Nov 3, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 3, 2006EAAUTEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED—
Nov 3, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 24, 2006GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 24, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 16, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 16, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance